You are currently browsing the daily archive for outubro 15, 2008.

Mostrando que além de Nobel também é um professor universitário com razoável tino para negócios (apesar de algo problemático), Paul Krugman anuncia que publicará em dezembro uma reedição revista e (aham, consideravelmente) ampliada de seu livro “The Return of Depression Economics“.  Justificativa: “we´re all Indonesia now“.

Bem a tempo para as compras de Natal.  Se houver Natal.

Anúncios

O Robert Reich tem uma visão diferente sobre a bolha do endividamento da classe média americana:

Post-Meltdown Mythologies (I): Americans Have Been Living Beyond Their Means

What brought on the economic meltdown of 2008? Besides the bursting of the housing bubble, Wall Street’s malfeasance and non-feasance, and Washington’s massive failure to oversee Wall Street, fingers are also being pointed at average Americans. Some of them took on mortgages they couldn’t afford, of course, but we’re also hearing a more basic theme that goes something like this: For too long, Americans have been living beyond our means. We went too deeply into debt. And now we’re paying the inevitable price.

The “living beyond our means” argument, with its thinly-veiled suggestion of moral terpitude, is technically correct. Over the last fifteen years, average household debt has soared to record levels, and the typical American family has taken on more of debt than it can safely manage. That became crystal clear when the housing bubble burst and home prices fell, eliminating easy home equity loans and refinancings.

But this story leaves out one very important fact. Since the year 2000, median family income has been dropping, adjusted for inflation. One of the main reasons the typical family has taken on more debt has been to maintain its living standards in the face of these declining real incomes.

It’s not as if the typical family suddenly went on a spending binge — buying yachts and fancy cars and taking ocean cruises. No, the typical family just tried to keep going as it had before. But with real incomes dropping, and the costs of necessities like gas, heating oil, food, health insurance, and even college tuitions all soaring, the only way to keep going as before was to borrow more. You might see this as a moral failure, but I think it’s more accurate to view it as an ongoing struggle to stay afloat when the boat’s sinking.

The “living beyond our means” argument suggests that the answer over the long term is for American families to become more responsible and not spend more than they earn. Well, that may be necessary but it’s hardly sufficient.

The real answer over the long term is to restore middle-class earnings so families don’t have to go deep into debt to maintain what was a middle-class standard of living. And that requires, among other things, affordable health insurance, tax credits for college tuition, good schools, and an energy policy that’s less dependent on oil, the price of which is going to continue to rise as demand soars in China, India, and elsewhere.

In other words, the way to make sure Americans don’t live beyond their means is to give them back the means.

Pode ser verdade, pode não ser.  A hipótese certamente pode ser testada contra números.  Como estou com uma tremenda preguiça de tentar fazer qualquer coisa neste sentido, acho que este comentário no próprio post do Reich acrescenta um dado importante a esta discussão toda:

a lot of average Americans ARE living beyond their means. The American concept of what is “normal” is out of touch with the reality of our economic situation. If more Americans travelled, they would see that their “normal” (size of cars, houses, energy consumption, food etc) are considered luxury in most other wealthy nations, like Europe or Japan.

outubro 2008
D S T Q Q S S
« set   nov »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Add to Technorati Favorites

Blog Stats

  • 1.555.275 hits
Anúncios